When sand is added on the top of a sand heap (also known as sandpile problem) two phenomena are observed:
Starting from this qualitative observation, P. Bak et
al. [9,10] have introduced a cellular automaton model (see Fig. fig_sandpile) where each site (for example in two
dimensions ) of the lattice has associated a slope
. If
the slope exceeds a critical value
a rearrangement of the
neighboring sites is performed, e.g.
is subtracted to the exceeded
value and
is added to its
neighboring sites. The automaton may
be executed in two different ways:
In both cases the systems reaches a stable configuration corresponding to the critical slope: every successive perturbation (i.e. increasing the field on some site) generates an avalanche that involves the rearrangement of a certain number of sites of the lattice. The authors show that the distribution of the extension of the avalanche follows a power law:
![]() |
(1.12) |
with
for three or four logarithmic decades. In
another work [206] the same authors define and study a set of
critical exponents similar to those used in statistical mechanics of
phase transitions.
The novelty of the work of Bak and coworkers is represented by the
fact that a model was found that showed a critical behavior
(i.e. power law relaxations, correlations at all sizes) without any
fine tuning of the external parameter, whereas usual critical phase
transitions need a precise tuning of the temperature to the critical
temperature . This self-organized critical behavior was
intriguing as it seemed to be a key concept to understand the ubiquity
of power laws in nature (e.g.
noise, self-similar structures
like fractals, turbulence and so on). The sandpile model is still
studied, with all its variants (for a review see for
example [101])), but it has been recognized to be not a
good paradigm for the self-organized criticality: it was seen in
fact [201,216] that the driving rate (i.e. the
rate of falling of grains on the top of the pile) acts exactly as a
control parameter that has to be fine tuned to zero in order to
observe criticality. However many important issues are still open: the
interplay between the self-organization into a stationary state and
the dynamical developing of correlations, the (numerical) measure of
critical exponents, universality classes, upper critical dimensions
and so on.
More remarkably, it has been pointed out that the sandpile model has
little to do with sand (and granular matter) in general. In 1992 Nagel
has published [169] the results of a series of experiments on
sand in order to verify the predictions of Bak and coworkers. He has
initially shown the difficulty of performing an exactly constant rate
in the pouring of grains from above the top of a pile. Therefore he
has introduced a different kind of experiment (see Fig. fig_sandpile2), where the sand fills partially a
rotating drum: the constant angular velocity of the drum guarantees
the constant driving needed to reach the critical slope and the
avalanche regime. The statistical analysis of the avalanches has
clearly demonstrated that sand does not reproduce the critical
behavior expected in self-organized criticality. The sandpile has two critical slopes: is the rest angle (when the slope is
less than
the pile is stable),
is maximum angle
(when the slope is larger than
avalanches form and reduce
the slope to an angle less than
). If the slope is comprised
in between
and
there is bistability,
i.e. the sand can rest or can produce avalanches, based on its
previous history. The avalanches have a typical duration and the
hysteretic cycle between the two angles has a well defined average
frequency. No power laws have been observed.