In Fig. fig_selfdiffusion we report the results of the observation of the average square distance walked by a particle versus time:
![]() |
(3.19) |
where is taken large enough (
), in
order to consider the system time translational invariant (i.e. the
initial conditions have been forgotten).
![]() |
From the figure it appears that the system presents normal diffusion in both the regimes (colliding and non-colliding), i.e.
![]() |
(3.20) |
The measurement of diffusion coefficients is more interesting. For equilibrium systems the Einstein relation is expected to be satisfied (fluctuation-dissipation relation):
with the typical kinetic relaxation time of the system,
. For example, in
the case of Brownian motion:
![]() |
(3.22) |
with Gaussian white noise
, it happens that
.
In the collisionless regime, where the heat bath dominates the
dynamics, the diffusion coefficient satisfies the Einstein
relation with the bath temperature and
, as expected.
One may expect that the characteristic relaxation time in the
colliding regime (
) is
, but the
measurement of the diffusion coefficient shows that this is not the
case. In general the diffusion coefficient is somehow very much larger
than that expected from this prediction. For the case shown in
Fig. fig_selfdiffusion, the time
is
compatible with
.
Furthermore the study of the elastic colliding regime, where
but
shows that
.
![]() |
These measurements are in agreement with the time self-correlation of velocity:
![]() |
(3.23) |
which is shown in Fig. fig_selfcorr. In all the cases presented an exponential decay is observed:
![]() |
(3.24) |
The characteristic relaxation times for the various cases are
compatible with the ones measured by means of the relation
(3.22). Remarkably, the relaxation time of the
colliding regime (elastic or inelastic) is almost equal to
. The slight difference that distinguishes these regimes from
the collisionless regime is in the short time behavior of
. The fit shown in the Figure is of the kind:
![]() |
(3.25) |
where
, while
. The long tails observed in the colliding case (elastic and inelastic) must not be
regarded as equivalent to the well known long tails (which are
algebraic) measured in elastic hard objects systems (Alder-Wainright,
etc.), but as a consequence of the fact that the gas is not at
equilibrium. In both elastic and inelastic cases, the particles have a
collision rate which is far shorter than the relaxation time due to
viscosity. On the other hand the viscosity has a far larger effect on
the velocities, as it drags systematically the system toward the
absence of flow. It happens that the viscous slow decay dominates the
behavior of the self-correlation after a few collision times, while
the very first decay is more rapid.
Finally we note that the differences between the relaxation time
measured in diffusion and that measured in the self-correlation
of velocity, appearing in the inelastic colliding regime, are
due to some violation of fluctuation-dissipation relations, which are
to be expected in systems out of equilibrium.