In the dynamics of the particles, as defined in
Eqs. (3.3), (3.4),
(3.5), the most important parameters are:
On the basis of these two parameters, we can define three fundamental limits of the dynamics of our model:
The elastic limit is smooth in dimensions (see for example
the discussion in paragraph 2.5), so that we can consider it
equivalent to put
. In this case the collisions mix up the
components leaving constant the energy (in the center of mass frame as
well in the absolute frame). We can assume that, in this limit, the
effect of the collisions is that of homogenizing the positions of the
particles and making their velocity distribution relax toward the
Maxwellian with temperature
(this temperature is equal to the starting kinetic energy,
but is modified by the relaxation toward
due to the Langevin
Eqs. (3.3)). In one dimension this mixing effect (toward a
``Maxwellian'') is no more at work, as the elastic collisions exactly
conserve the starting velocity distribution (the collisions can be
viewed as exchanges of labels and the particles as non-interacting
walkers).
In the collisionless limit we have
and
therefore, the collisions are very rare events with respect to the
characteristic time of the bath. In this case we can consider the
model as an ensemble of non-interacting Brownian walkers, each
following the Eqs. (3.3). Therefore, whatever
is, and
in any dimension, the distribution of velocities relaxes in a time
toward a Maxwellian with temperature
with a homogeneous density.
Finally, in the cooling limit, the collisions are almost the
only events that act on the distribution of velocities, while between
collisions the particles move almost ballistically. In this limit (if
) the gas can be considered stationary only on observation times
very long with respect to the time of the bath
, where the
effect of the external driving (the Langevin equation) emerges. For
observation times larger than the mean free time
but shorter
than
, the gas appears as a cooling granular gas. This
limit is considered in Chapter V of this thesis.
To conclude this brief discussion on the expected behavior of the randomly driven granular gas model, we sketch a scenario with the presence of two fundamental stationary regimes: